Comparison of Prenatal and Postnatal Treatment of Myelomeningocele: A Systematic Review

carrollscholars.object.departmentHealth Sciences
dc.contributor.advisorSchafer, Gerald
dc.contributor.authorGannon, Sydney
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-06T18:23:49Z
dc.date.available2024-05-06T18:23:49Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractObjective: To review relevant literature concerning the impact of prenatal repair of myelomeningocele on overall infant and maternal health, compared to postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. Methods: Literature was gathered through PubMed and CINAHL and assessed for long- and short-term effects of prenatal and postnatal repair of myelomeningocele on infant and maternal health. Results: Prenatal repair was associated with significant health and functionality improvements in later childhood compared to postnatal repair, but it was also correlated with increased pre-labor risks for both mother and child. Conclusions: While unique, individual features such as lesion size have an impact on the suggested treatment of myelomeningocele, current research suggests that prenatal repair is associated with more positive long-term health than postnatal repair; however, this treatment comes with the risk of complications in the pre-labor stages. The interventions mentioned in this review should be further researched to provide additional treatment options.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12647/10817
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.titleComparison of Prenatal and Postnatal Treatment of Myelomeningocele: A Systematic Review
dc.typePresentation
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Sydney Gannon SRF 2024.pdf
Size:
233.76 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.79 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: