Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorElvira Roncalli
dc.contributor.authorMoulton, Megan
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-30T10:09:52Z
dc.date.available2020-04-30T10:09:52Z
dc.date.issued2017-12-11
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholars.carroll.edu/handle/20.500.12647/3600
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, I explore the origin of the moral authority to judge another person’s wrong actions through the relationships to those involved in the situation. I also argue that moral authority has an aspect grounded in past experience with similar situations and the ability to understand what it means to be held and to hold another morally responsible. The purpose of defining moral authority and its application is determined to be for the moral growth of the perpetrator, until further development is denied, in which case the possible occurrence of manipulation to stay in relation with the unchanging person is considered.
dc.titleMoral Judgment: why should we judge and who has the right to?
dc.typePaper
carrollscholars.object.departmentPhilosophy
carrollscholars.object.disciplinesEthics and Political Philosophy; Philosophy
carrollscholars.legacy.itemurlhttps://scholars.carroll.edu/phil495/moral_authority/moral_authority/9
carrollscholars.legacy.contextkey10823242
carrollscholars.object.seasonFall
carrollscholars.object.coursenumberPHIL 495
carrollscholars.object.coursenameMoral Authority


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record