• Login
    View Item 
    •   Carroll Scholars Home
    • Life and Environmental Sciences
    • Life and Environmental Sciences Undergraduate Theses
    • View Item
    •   Carroll Scholars Home
    • Life and Environmental Sciences
    • Life and Environmental Sciences Undergraduate Theses
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    The Relative Activity Of Mouse-Eared (Myotis spp.) And Brown (Eptesicus spp.) Bats (Chiroptera: Verspertilionidae) In Five Habitat Types Around Spring Meadow Lake

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    1998_SchletzK_THS_000285.pdf (3.109Mb)
    Author
    Schletz, Katerine
    Advisor
    Grant Hokit; John Addis; Patrick Jodice
    Date of Issue
    1998-04-01
    Subject Keywords
    bats, Helena, Montana, Myotis, Eptesicus, Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    URI
    https://scholars.carroll.edu/handle/20.500.12647/2881
    Title
    The Relative Activity Of Mouse-Eared (Myotis spp.) And Brown (Eptesicus spp.) Bats (Chiroptera: Verspertilionidae) In Five Habitat Types Around Spring Meadow Lake
    Type
    thesis
    Abstract
    The number of habitat types that bats can efficiently exploit may be limited by bat morphology (mass, wingspan, wing area, wing shape) and echolocation calls. Analysis of these characteristics can be used to predict which habitats bats are most likely to use. Slower, more maneuverable bats such as Myotis spp. should be able to exploit cluttered habitats in which prey densities are high, whereas larger, faster bats such as Eptesicus fuscus should be less able to use cluttered habitats due to an inability to maneuver efficiently in such habitats. I surveyed bats belonging to two genera, Myotis and Eptesicus, between 29 July and 30 August, 1997 at Spring Meadow Lake, a state recreation area on the western outskirts of Helena, Montana. Five habitat types were monitored for relative bat activity. The habitats were an open field (OP), a canopied area (CA) characterized by Salix spp., and three shoreline habitats representing low (SW), medium (ME), and high (TH) vegetation densities. Overall, bats were found to be most active at the shoreline sites of medium vegetation density, with relative abundance at other habitat types decreasing in the following order: SW, TH, CA/OP. Myotis spp. activity reflected this same trend. However, Eptesicus spp. activity was not significantly associated with any of the habitat types. Both field and canopy sites were virtually devoid of any bat activity. Greatest bat foraging activity (feeding buzz ratio) was associated with the ME habitat type, reflecting the overall relative abundance of bats. There was a significant difference in foraging activity between the ME and OP habitat types, but not between other habitat types for Myotis spp. Results are consistent with research showing that some species of Myotis favor aquatic habitats over terrestrial habitats. Greatest relative bat activity at shoreline sites of medium vegetation may reflect a cost-benefit “decision” to forage in an area in which the combination of prey density and extent of surrounding clutter enables the greatest net energy gain.
    Degree Awarded
    Bachelor's
    Semester
    Spring
    Department
    Life & Environmental Sciences
    Collections
    • Life and Environmental Sciences Undergraduate Theses

    Browse

    All of Carroll ScholarsCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2023  DuraSpace
    DSpace Express is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV