Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHarry Smith
dc.contributor.advisorChris Dollaghan
dc.contributor.advisorJean Smith
dc.contributor.authorKelly, Lori
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-30T09:39:47Z
dc.date.available2020-04-30T09:39:47Z
dc.date.issued1983-04-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholars.carroll.edu/handle/20.500.12647/242
dc.description.abstractStuttering is generally considered to consist of three major components: (1) cognitive, (2) emotional, and (3) behavioral (Gronhovd, 1976). Each of these areas appears to be a somewhat specific and independent aspect of stuttering, and, as a consequence, each requires somewhat different strategies for assessment and management. The cognitive aspect deals with the stutterer's information and attitudes regarding normal speech, normal speakers fluency, stuttering, and how to deal with communication situa tions (Gronhovd, 1976). This area also includes the person's awareness of his disfluencies and his consequent conclusions about his adequacy as a speaker and a person. Discussion, counseling, and education comprise the primary strategies for remediation in this area. The emotional aspect of stuttering includes both the individual's level of general anxiety and the nature and extent of speech-related anxieties. It is important to deter mine if there is an abnormal amount of general anxiety or if the person feels anxiety primarily in relation to disfluency, words, sounds, and/or speech situations (Brutten <br /> and Shoemaker, 1967, pp. 30-31). Generalized high anxiety suggests a need for the services of a trained psychologist. However, the more common speech-related anxieties can usually be managed by speech pathologists through one of several methods of systematic desensitization. The behavioral aspect has been traditionally viewed in terms of primary behaviors (repetitions and prolongations) and secondary behaviors (instrumentally-learned escape and avoidance behaviors). However, recent research suggests that a more molecular view of stuttering behavior is necessary (Shames & Sherrick, 1965, pp. 55-56} , including specific analysis and management of airflow (Adams, 1974, p. 36), phonetic transition and co-articulation (M. Wingate, 1969, pp. 107- 108), and tension (Gronhovd, 1975, p. 6), in addition to the usual elimination of the secondary behaviors. This view suggests that remedial programs aimed at modification of stuttering behavior need to be somewhat more complex and thorough than the currently popular approach of simply reinforcing fluent speech.
dc.titleAnalysis Of The Airflow Program Relative To The Behavioral Dimensions Of Stuttering
dc.typethesis
carrollscholars.object.degreeBachelor's
carrollscholars.object.departmentCommunication Studies
carrollscholars.object.disciplinesCommunication Sciences and Disorders; Speech Pathology and Audiology
carrollscholars.legacy.itemurlhttps://scholars.carroll.edu/communication_theses/42
carrollscholars.legacy.contextkey12506497
carrollscholars.object.seasonSpring
dc.date.embargo1/1/1983 0:00


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record