• Login
    View Item 
    •   Carroll Scholars Home
    • Communication Studies
    • Communication Studies Undergraduate Theses
    • View Item
    •   Carroll Scholars Home
    • Communication Studies
    • Communication Studies Undergraduate Theses
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    The Case for Developing And Implementing Proactive Crisis Management Planning At Carroll College

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    1993_FoellerK_THS_000441.pdf (3.897Mb)
    Author
    Foeller, Kurt
    Advisor
    Brent Northup; Kay Satre; Peggy Stebbins
    Date of Issue
    1993-04-01
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    URI
    https://scholars.carroll.edu/handle/20.500.12647/227
    Title
    The Case for Developing And Implementing Proactive Crisis Management Planning At Carroll College
    Type
    thesis
    Abstract
    It is early in the morning at a men's dormitory on a college campus. The residents are in a quiet slumber after a typical weeknight of fun. Suddenly, the calm is shattered by two shotgun blasts and the sound of someone running down the hall for the nearest exit. Two freshmen lay bleeding on the floor. Someone calls 911, campus security, and then the college administrators. Everyone wants answers. Hundreds of students wait anxiously near the scene. The media will soon arrive and probably won't leave until the troubling questions are answered: Who did it? Who is dead? How did someone bring a gun into the dorm without anyone knowing, or did they know and do nothing about it? People are outraged and want to know all the circumstances. The clock is ticking. The college must take action. Is there a plan to handle this crisis? On May 15, 1990, this scenario actually occurred at Montana State University in Bozeman, Montana. These were the first murders in the history of the college. No one could believe such a disaster could happen (Associated Press, 1990). Three days later, a deranged gunman walked onto the campus of Carroll College. He drew a .44 caliber revolver and shot two employees of the Marriott Food Service in the Upper Commons, killing one. Again, it was the first murder in the history of the college (Associated Press, 1990). Although these disasters may seem extraordinary, organizational crises are on the rise and occurring more frequently (Mitroff, Pauchant and Shirvastava, 1989; Udwadia and Mitroff, 1991). No organization is immune to crisis any more (Fink, 1986). There are many crises that an organization may encounter, varying in cause, degree of violence, type and level of damage. Any poorly managed crisis has the potential of causing serious organizational damage ranging from lost money to a damaged reputation. The increased incidence of organizational crises has given rise to the newly developed field of crisis management, a field dedicated to analyzing and predicting such crises. Fink (1986) defines crisis management as, "the art of removing much of the risk and uncertainty to allow you to achieve more control over your own destiny (p. 15)." Crisis management researchers are slowly learning how to predict the unpredictable - to manage even the worst crisis. At times, these researchers have been able to objectively explain, predict, and control the dynamics of organizational crisis. More organizations than ever before are organizing task forces and writing plans to prepare for crises (Stanton, 1989). There are proven ways to prevent crises from occurring. Also, newly developed methods of crisis communication and damage control have proven effective in limiting the possible negative effects crises may have on organizations.It is early in the morning at a men's dormitory on a college campus. The residents are in a quiet slumber after a typical weeknight of fun. Suddenly, the calm is shattered by two shotgun blasts and the sound of someone running down the hall for the nearest exit. Two freshmen lay bleeding on the floor. Someone calls 911, campus security, and then the college administrators. Everyone wants answers. Hundreds of students wait anxiously near the scene. The media will soon arrive and probably won't leave until the troubling questions are answered: Who did it? Who is dead? How did someone bring a gun into the dorm without anyone knowing, or did they know and do nothing about it? People are outraged and want to know all the circumstances. The clock is ticking. The college must take action. Is there a plan to handle this crisis? On May 15, 1990, this scenario actually occurred at Montana State University in Bozeman, Montana. These were the first murders in the history of the college. No one could believe such a disaster could happen (Associated Press, 1990). Three days later, a deranged gunman walked onto the campus of Carroll College. He drew a .44 caliber revolver and shot two employees of the Marriott Food Service in the Upper Commons, killing one. Again, it was the first murder in the history of the college (Associated Press, 1990). Although these disasters may seem extraordinary, organizational crises are on the rise and occurring more frequently (Mitroff, Pauchant and Shirvastava, 1989; Udwadia and Mitroff, 1991). No organization is immune to crisis any more (Fink, 1986). There are many crises that an organization may encounter, varying in cause, degree of violence, type and level of damage. Any poorly managed crisis has the potential of causing serious organizational damage ranging from lost money to a damaged reputation. The increased incidence of organizational crises has given rise to the newly developed field of crisis management, a field dedicated to analyzing and predicting such crises. Fink (1986) defines crisis management as, "the art of removing much of the risk and uncertainty to allow you to achieve more control over your own destiny (p. 15)." Crisis management researchers are slowly learning how to predict the unpredictable - to manage even the worst crisis. At times, these researchers have been able to objectively explain, predict, and control the dynamics of organizational crisis. More organizations than ever before are organizing task forces and writing plans to prepare for crises (Stanton, 1989). There are proven ways to prevent crises from occurring. Also, newly developed methods of crisis communication and damage control have proven effective in limiting the possible negative effects crises may have on organizations.It is early in the morning at a men's dormitory on a college campus. The residents are in a quiet slumber after a typical weeknight of fun. Suddenly, the calm is shattered by two shotgun blasts and the sound of someone running down the hall for the nearest exit. Two freshmen lay bleeding on the floor. Someone calls 911, campus security, and then the college administrators. Everyone wants answers. Hundreds of students wait anxiously near the scene. The media will soon arrive and probably won't leave until the troubling questions are answered: Who did it? Who is dead? How did someone bring a gun into the dorm without anyone knowing, or did they know and do nothing about it? People are outraged and want to know all the circumstances. The clock is ticking. The college must take action. Is there a plan to handle this crisis? On May 15, 1990, this scenario actually occurred at Montana State University in Bozeman, Montana. These were the first murders in the history of the college. No one could believe such a disaster could happen (Associated Press, 1990). Three days later, a deranged gunman walked onto the campus of Carroll College. He drew a .44 caliber revolver and shot two employees of the Marriott Food Service in the Upper Commons, killing one. Again, it was the first murder in the history of the college (Associated Press, 1990). Although these disasters may seem extraordinary, organizational crises are on the rise and occurring more frequently (Mitroff, Pauchant and Shirvastava, 1989; Udwadia and Mitroff, 1991). No organization is immune to crisis any more (Fink, 1986). There are many crises that an organization may encounter, varying in cause, degree of violence, type and level of damage. Any poorly managed crisis has the potential of causing serious organizational damage ranging from lost money to a damaged reputation. The increased incidence of organizational crises has given rise to the newly developed field of crisis management, a field dedicated to analyzing and predicting such crises. Fink (1986) defines crisis management as, "the art of removing much of the risk and uncertainty to allow you to achieve more control over your own destiny (p. 15)." Crisis management researchers are slowly learning how to predict the unpredictable - to manage even the worst crisis. At times, these researchers have been able to objectively explain, predict, and control the dynamics of organizational crisis. More organizations than ever before are organizing task forces and writing plans to prepare for crises (Stanton, 1989). There are proven ways to prevent crises from occurring. Also, newly developed methods of crisis communication and damage control have proven effective in limiting the possible negative effects crises may have on organizations.
    Degree Awarded
    Bachelor's
    Semester
    Spring
    Department
    Communication Studies
    Collections
    • Communication Studies Undergraduate Theses

    Browse

    All of Carroll ScholarsCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2022  DuraSpace
    DSpace Express is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV