• Login
    View Item 
    •   Carroll Scholars Home
    • Carroll College Student Undergraduate Research Festival
    • Carroll College Student Undergraduate Research Festival 2020
    • View Item
    •   Carroll Scholars Home
    • Carroll College Student Undergraduate Research Festival
    • Carroll College Student Undergraduate Research Festival 2020
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    An Application of the Justification-Suppression Model of Prejudice to the Disability Wage Gap

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Bechtel_Rachel_SURF2020.mp4 (171.4Mb)
    0-Bechtel_Rachel_SURF2020Slides.pptx (1.214Mb)
    1-Bechtel_Rachel_SURF2020Slides.pdf (792.3Kb)
    Author
    Bechtel, Rachel
    Date of Issue
    2020-04-24
    Subject Keywords
    Disability Studies; Social and Behavioral Sciences; Social Psychology
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    URI
    https://scholars.carroll.edu/handle/20.500.12647/10224; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SoHIOhDXU8I
    Title
    An Application of the Justification-Suppression Model of Prejudice to the Disability Wage Gap
    Type
    Presentation
    Abstract
    I studied the disability wage gap by examining how participants’ hiring decisions changed with varying levels of justification and with the educational attainment of candidates with and without disabilities. The justification-suppression model demonstrates how expressed prejudice increases as justification increases. Participants (N = 77) were randomly assigned to read fictitious hiring materials for either a disabled or nondisabled (control) candidate. I further manipulated the level of justification present (i.e., the level of accommodation requested) and the educational level of the candidate. Participants reported the salary and position they would give to the applicant, their perceptions of the candidate, and their levels of suppression of prejudice toward disabled persons. Results demonstrated that disabled candidates with lower education received a wage advantage over nondisabled candidates with similar levels of education, perhaps suggesting a bend-over-backwards or sympathy effect. However, disabled candidates were perceived more negatively than nondisabled candidates, perhaps as a result of their defiance of stereotypical perceptions of disabled people as incompetent as posited by the stereotype content model. Inconsistent with the justification-suppression model of prejudice, suppression and justification were not significantly associated with any form of employment discrimination. Overall results indicate that disability has an effect on both participants’ perceptions of the candidates and their salaries. These findings may inform future research to explore effective legislative and educational approaches to eliminate disability-based employment discrimination.
    Semester
    Spring
    Department
    Psychology
    Collections
    • Carroll College Student Undergraduate Research Festival 2020

    Browse

    All of Carroll ScholarsCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2023  DuraSpace
    DSpace Express is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV